Talk:Magdeburg

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magdeburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Top‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old talk

Nice example of perfect propaganda.

995 By a patent of Otto III Silesia was attached to the see of Meissen? under the archbishopric of Magdeburg. Soon after Otto III founded Breslau bishopric and Breslau city in Silesia.

I don't know if SIlesia was attachefd to Meissen, but it is possible. It is true that soon after (in 1000) Otton III founded Wroclaw (Breslau) bishopric (but it was founded under Gniezn archbishopric) but Breslau was definetely not founded by OTTON III

Water bridge?

I heard there was some special kind of 'water bridge/canal' in Magdeburg. Can anybody verify it/link/provide photos? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 22:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's a water-filled bridge over the Elbe that connects the Mittellandkanal with the Elbe-Havel-Kanal so that ships do not have to go through locks in order to get from one canal to the other. [1] --Chl 00:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So it's something like a navigable aqueduct? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 14:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, here is a link to a photo on this site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdeburg

What you are lookung for actualy already can be found in wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdeburg_Water_Bridge

Devastation of the city during WW II

In a special of the regional public radio station in connection with the 63rd anniversary of the devastating bombings a number is mentioned: 95 % of the city centre was destroyed.

http://www.mdr.de/mdr1-radio-sachsen-anhalt/1141145.html

Would that be a valid source?--Zarbi1 (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History section

I am currently translating the history section at de:Magdeburg into English. I will make the result available at my sandbox when I'm finished tomorrow. I'd appreciate comments before I include this in the article. Maybe it is sensible to create an extra entry History of Magdeburg, but I'm unsure if the translated version lends itself to that or not. Madcynic (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Did not materialise due to time constraints, hence striking that comment. Madcynic (talk) 15:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

translation

as far as i know the part word "madge-" comes from "madga" which means mighty. even though i got no reference, just heard it some months ago in ger public radio. u might just give it a thought —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.102.20.252 (talk) 21:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the word is a cognate with the old English word, "mickle", "large" or "much" (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/mickle?s=t). The root of the name "Mecklenburg" has the same meaning, "large fortress". Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 20:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

is "Equestrion" really the best translation of "Reiter?" I get that the German verb exclusively refers to horse riders, but I still believe "Rider" is a better translation. Equestrion makes it seem like he is perfoming pony tricks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.90.208.106 (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's not the best translation. Neither is "rider", though it might be the best of all alternatives. "Reiter" can have a military connotation, and depending on the time period, it could refer to mounted knights, to cavalrymen. The spelling varied, too, from "Reiter" in modern High German, to "Reuter". As far as equestrian statues go, there is also a famous statue in Bamberg, the Bamberger Reiter. Given that the statue in Magdeburg depicts a mounted nobleman (a king?), "Rider" probably the best of all alternatives. Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

I made the change from "Equestrian" to "Rider" just now. Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

Foreign Residents

The box shows the populations of foreign residents as of 2014, and then the list contains "Soviet Union" and "SFR Yugoslavia", I do believe that both of those countries no longer existed as of 2014. Is this how the foreign residents are still identified? JRSofty (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Steuben Monument.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Magdeburg Cathedral towers are not the highest in East-Germany

The Schwerin Cathedral is higher (117 m) in East-Germany. The St. Mary Church in Stralsund has 104 m. The Magdeburg Cathedral has 99,25 m (south tower) and 101 m (North tower). 104 metres are to much. 32-Fuß-Freak (talk) 20:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add something about the attack that occurred today in the Christmas market?

The attack in the Christmas market is a majorly significant event, and I believe it warrants enough significance to be mentioned here. Should I add something about it? 149.22.219.132 (talk) 21:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but reliable sources need to be included. The page is protected so IP's can't edit this page. -- Guiy de Montfort de L'Amaury 21:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]