Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFP)
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Brian Jones

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP keeps trying to remove cited information. ★Trekker (talk) 08:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    US Lecce

    Reason: High level of IP Vandalisms and arbitrary removal of contents. Of course no ref is added for such things Riktetta (talk) 08:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them the first warning. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ruthvika Gadde

    Reason: All content added to the page are from reliable sources. But others keep reverting and deleting my edits even though i provided correct reference links. Its my sister's page and all details enclosed in it are reliable. Gadde.ruthvika (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I can provide proofs for details that are enclosed in the page. Gadde.ruthvika (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined On Wikipedia we follow strict policies regarding content, especially biographies of the living people. Every claim should be supported by independent reliable source. Even if it's true it's not enough for Wikipedia. Also if you are closely connected to the subject of the article, you are strongly recommended to avoid editing and you should disclose this on the talk page. If you are a sister of the subject please work with other users so the information is neutral and supported by the sources. Less Unless (talk) 18:08, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Majha

    Permanent semi-protection: Continued high level of IP vandalism. Sutyarashi (talk) 13:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 59.103.195.78 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 72 hours. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ainsley Earhardt

    Reason: IP addresses continue making politically-motivated biased edits and reversions in her Personal Life section. Yonkel21 (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    2008–2009 Oslo anti-Israel riots

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Subject to WP:CT/A-I restrictions, as the catalyst to the riots was the Gaza War, I believe it relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in two months before yours, and historical events generally have less nexus to the current conflict to justify the kind of protection you're requesting. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Oliver Dovin

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. This resolves all these requests. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Luis Binks

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Jay Dasilva

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Bobby Thomas (footballer)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Jack Rudoni

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tatsuhiro Sakamoto

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Jamie Allen (footballer, born January 1995)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ellis Simms

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ephron Mason-Clark

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Haji Wright

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ben Wilson (footballer, born 1992)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ben Sheaf

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Liam Kitching

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Raphael Borges Rodrigues

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Jake Bidwell

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Joel Latibeaudiere

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Brandon Thomas-Asante

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Milan van Ewijk

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Josh Eccles

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Victor Torp

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Fábio Tavares (footballer, born 2001)

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Norman Bassette

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Bradley Collins

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:9240:BC00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DC Universe (franchise)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive editing from unregistered users for this highly sought-after page. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2.98.147.186 (talk · contribs) blocked by Stwalkerster. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Shariful Haque Dalim

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 18:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Fred Kerley

    Reason: In the wake of his controversial January 2025 arrest, requesting temporary semi-protection to prevent unregistered accounts and IPs from vandalising or inserting false/misleading information on a high-profile BLP article, until more information is released. Per WP:BLPCRIME. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 18:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like you've got things under control for now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    2024 North America heat waves

    Reason: High levels of sockpuppetry. 134.6.109.138 (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator Yamla. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Generation Beta

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Some1 (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Apparently we still need this. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    The Vivienne

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to recent death Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Mirka Ginova

    Reason: Persistent IP disruption. One IP already got blocked for disrupting the article and another IP came to continue it. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    List of members of the 16th National Assembly of Pakistan

    Reason: An IP is engaging in disruptive editing by evading their block and altering the party affiliations of members, which does not align with the National Assembly source. This action constitutes a WP:BLPVIO. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk per WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    When the Phone Rings

    Reason: Persistent vandalism. Continued after recent protection period expired. 142.254.120.227 (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    The Fantastic Four: First Steps

    Reason: High level of unconstructive, unsourced & untrue/speculative disruptive editing from IP editors. Semi-protection may help cut this down. BarntToust 20:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Triumph Tour

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from IPs. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Brian D'Ambrosio

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Just updated this article to add criminal convictions. Based on edit history by multiple IPs and new accounts, I suspect the subject monitors this article and has edited it in the past. ECP for a month or so seems appropriate to prevent edit warring, whitewashing and vandalism. Montanabw(talk) 21:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It also sounds like you're asking for pre-emptive protection, which outside of new ARBPIA articles we don't grant. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Gaza genocide

    Genocide Watch states that: „A genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel is underway in Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister General Yoav Gallant have demonstrated their intent to destroy a substantial portion of the civilian population of Gaza. Israel is committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Gaza. It is also committing crimes against humanity against Palestinians in the West Bank.” See https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-emergency-gaza-and-the-west-bank-2024 This information should be added to first paragraph of Gaza_genocide#NGOs_and_intergovernmental_organisations Jakub Onderka (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=1267599655"